''It is telling, indeed, that Senator Harry Reid scheduled the vote on H.R. 3590 for the middle of the night, being the unethical, amoral coward that he is.''
At 1 a.m. on December 21, 2009, in the dark of night, the first cloture vote was taken on H.R. 3590, Senator Harry Reid's Obama Deathcare Bill.
The bill and all actions taken thus far can be found by clicking here and, in the search slot, entering "H.R. 3590", clicking on "Bill Number" then clicking "SEARCH". (This procedure will work for any bill you wish to look at.)
How your Senator voted on cloture December 21, 2009, in the middle of the night, can be found here and also accessible under "All Congressional Actions with Amendments" when H.R. 3590 is put in the search slot on the main page of thomas.loc.gov. The vote was all Democrats (60) voting "yes" and all Republicans (40) voting "no".
You will note that this bill, voted on by the Senate, is not a Senate bill; it is a House bill. How can it be that a House bill was used to introduce language written by the Senate?
A House bill was used, its language stricken and substituted by Senator Reid and his co-conspirators, because the Senate cannot, constitutionally, introduce a bill that appropriates money.
As such, the Senate's way of circumventing this is to take a House bill, sent to the Senate after House passage, and strike the language and introduce language written by Senators.
Is this constitutional? Let's put it this way, that was not what was intended when the Constitution was written. But then, the Constitution, in the words of John Adams, was written for a moral and religious people; being wholly inadequate for people who have no morals, no conscience and certainly no principles or standards; who believe right and wrong are situational, pliant to whatever their agenda is. http://www.newswithviews.com/Stuter/stuter168.htm
The bill and all actions taken thus far can be found by clicking here and, in the search slot, entering "H.R. 3590", clicking on "Bill Number" then clicking "SEARCH". (This procedure will work for any bill you wish to look at.)
How your Senator voted on cloture December 21, 2009, in the middle of the night, can be found here and also accessible under "All Congressional Actions with Amendments" when H.R. 3590 is put in the search slot on the main page of thomas.loc.gov. The vote was all Democrats (60) voting "yes" and all Republicans (40) voting "no".
You will note that this bill, voted on by the Senate, is not a Senate bill; it is a House bill. How can it be that a House bill was used to introduce language written by the Senate?
A House bill was used, its language stricken and substituted by Senator Reid and his co-conspirators, because the Senate cannot, constitutionally, introduce a bill that appropriates money.
As such, the Senate's way of circumventing this is to take a House bill, sent to the Senate after House passage, and strike the language and introduce language written by Senators.
Is this constitutional? Let's put it this way, that was not what was intended when the Constitution was written. But then, the Constitution, in the words of John Adams, was written for a moral and religious people; being wholly inadequate for people who have no morals, no conscience and certainly no principles or standards; who believe right and wrong are situational, pliant to whatever their agenda is. http://www.newswithviews.com/Stuter/stuter168.htm
No comments:
Post a Comment