Mike Corthell

Mike Corthell
Editor & Publisher at Fryeburg Free Press MEDIA

Tuesday, July 31, 2012

Porch Swing

Porch Swing

Sitting on our porch swing
swaying in the warm summer's breeze
my hand enveloping yours
your eyes smile to mine

We need not say a word
knowing each other's thoughts
Who would have thought
that we would come this far

Many years have come and gone
so much heartache
so much laughter
All and all...

[Time has been good
to that older couple
swaying in the swing
time has given them contentment

Time has tamed their restless hearts
Listen carefully and you will hear
their song of yesterday
in the whispers of the wind…]

July 2032

A Bad President, a Bad American

He is a bad president. He is a bad black man. He is a bad socialist. He is a bad peacemaker. He is a bad American. And most of all, he is bad for America and the world.
Obama is bad. Not in the reverse meaning of the term, by which one indicates that an individual is actually cool or intimidating or otherwise superlative in some manner, but in the simple and straightforward negative sense. He is a bad president. He is a bad black man. He is a bad socialist. He is a bad peacemaker. He is a bad American. And most of all, he is bad for America and the world.
Even many of those who supported Obama and who voted for him in 2008 will agree that he has been a bad president. Contrary to his grandiose claims during his successful presidential campaign, the oceans have not begun to recede and the planet has not begun to heal despite the fact that we have entered the fourth year of his presidency. Of perhaps more interest to Americans is that the national debt has not begun to recede and the U.S. economy has not begun to heal, either.
He is more than merely a bad socialist; he is so subservient to the interests of the financial institutions, particularly Goldman Sachs, that he makes rabid capitalists like Max Keiser and Peter Schiff look like red flag-waving Jacobins in comparison. Four years after the start of the financial crisis that he has repeatedly attempted to blame on the Bush administration, neither he nor any of the agencies that report to him have found a single banker whose crimes merit prosecution, despite the massive amount of mortgage fraud, financial fraud, money laundering for Mexican drug gangs and now interest-rate manipulation.Obama is also a bad black man. While I am not qualified to pronounce judgment on these matters, here we can rely upon the considered opinion of Chris Rock. The black comedian recently declared that “we ignore the president’s whiteness, but it’s there, it’s there.” And let’s face it, despite Obama’s well-known love for basketball, the man dances with all the urban smoothness of the average white girl attending one of the Seven Sisters.
Despite winning the Nobel Peace Prize, Obama is a bad peacemaker. He has started several new wars, openly assassinated foreigners and U.S. citizens alike, and now appears to have the U.S. on the verge of war with either Iran or Syria, or quite possibly both. It is easy to forget that it was his running on an anti-war platform that allowed him to upset Hillary Clinton, as that was possibly the biggest pre-election deception since George W. Bush’s claim that his administration would pursue “a humble foreign policy.”
To say that Obama is a bad American is not to cast doubt upon either his citizenship or his birthplace. While the inept forgery that the White House attempted to pass off as his birth certificate does tend to raise questions, the larger problem is that the erstwhile eater of dogs appears to have a more tenuous grasp on America and what it means to be an American than the average European whose only exposure to the country was MTV and re-runs of “Dallas.” Americans are born rebels, a people born in violent rebellion, who view authority with a suspicious and jaundiced eye. Obama, on the other hand, instinctively bows to it and appears to be genuinely surprised when the American public don’t show an inclination to follow suit.
And finally, Obama is bad for both America and the world. The biggest problem presently facing the world is the tremendous amount of debt hanging over all of the major industrial economies, which as a ratio of debt/GDP is more than 50 percent higher than during the Great Depression. And yet, Obama not only hasn’t attempted to do anything about reducing this debt, he has repeatedly chosen to support the very individuals and organizations responsible for creating the perilous situation in the first place. While he wasn’t responsible for creating the problem, he has knowingly exacerbated it with his landmark federal health-care regime and his refusal to confront the Federal Reserve and hold it responsible for its gargantuan failures.
In three months, Obama will stand before the American people, seeking their stamp of approval for four years of bad governance. If they grant it, they will have no cause for complaint that they did not know what they were getting.

Back in 2012...

Dennis D. Dinktwigger: Laugh

Here's a thought...  An onion can make people cry, but there has never been a vegetable invented to make them laugh. 
And then....
I have always noticed that people will never laugh at anything that is not based on truth. 

Monday, July 30, 2012

The Marking of America

All U.S. citizens, including babies, will receive a mandatory microchip soon. This is not some dark conspiracy; it has been openly discussed and placed in various pieces of legislation for decades by Republicans and Democrats, beginning in 1974. A microchip implant is in the Obama health care bill. However, most people miss seeing that because it is written using ambiguous and technical language. The language defines a microchip implant as, “A class II device that is implantable.” According to the government’s own definition, the term, “A Class II device that is implantable,” is a transponder or RFID chip. Therefore it is a microchip!
However, it is important to understand that Obama did not originate the plan to microchip all American citizens of the population. Ultimately, President Obama is not the problem regarding the microchip implant! The Republicans planned for the microchip implant before Obama ever entered the White House. In reality, this merely demonstrates that the distinction between Democrats and Republicans is almost entirely meaningless. Both parties serve the agenda of the global elites who issue instructions to the elected officials they put in power to do their bidding. The ultimate goal is to microchip the entire population of planet earth and in nations like India, a microchip implant in their nation I.D. card, has been distributed to hundreds of millions of people.

It was not President Obama, a Democrat, but Tommy Thompson, a Republican Governor from Wisconsin and the former Secretary of Health and Human Services, who pushed for the microchip under President Bush. Tommy Thompson supported the Verichip, which is a microchip implant, presented as a “useful tool in sharing medical information.” Thompson sat on the board of directors of Verichip’s company Applied Digital Solutions, which is now known as PositiveID. In 2007, Thompson resigned from the board of the company.
Ironically, while Thompson worked to microchip the U.S. population, he personally refused to receive a microchip implant himself. Thompson, who is a pro-life activist and claims to have Christian religious beliefs, worked to implement a microchip implant, which many Christians believe could lead to the mark of the beast in the Book of Revelation, Chapter 13. It is staggering to see the number of political leaders who profess to be Christians and yet who are the very same people who promote legislation that undermines their Christian belief system. The reason for this seeming contradiction is that the majority of so-called “Christian” politicians do not have a Biblical worldview. Their understanding of God’s Word is superficial and often not genuine, which is a reflection of the lack of good Bible teaching in the pulpits of America. We have entire denominations and churches who actually forbid the teaching of Bible prophecy and the Book of Revelation, which is the official policy of Communist China as well!

The root problem in America is not an economic or political one. It is not the responsibility of politicians to understand the theological and prophetic implications of a microchip implant. It is the responsibility of the church to educate both the public and elected officials about what the Bible has to say about the “mark of the beast” and how a microchip implant, parallels the description of the “mark of the beast” in Revelation 13. The root problem in America, is an apostate Church, which has chosen to reject God’s Word, especially in areas of prophecy. The history of Israel is an account of the cycles of judgment and restoration they went through based on their rejection of God’s Word, or repentance. But the root problem for Israel was always the collective rejection of God’s Word and choosing to worship idols.
Although, America is not Israel, the Pilgrims and Puritans did enter into a Covenant with God over America and we seem to see similar cycles repeated. There can be no reformation, revival or Great Awakening without direct acknowledgement of this central problem in American Christianity. Economic, political and cultural problems are always a symptom of a deeper spiritual problem. For example, when any nation begins to look at their government to be God, or their political leaders to be a Messiah, this is idolatry. The first of the Ten Commandments states, “Thou shall have no other Gods before me.” Exodus 20:3 The violation of this Commandment, always leads to economic, social and political destruction.
In 2012, VeriTeQ Acquisition Corporation, a marketer of implantable RFID technologies for patient identification and sensor applications, announced it had acquired the VeriChip implantable microchip and related technologies, and Health Link personal health record from PositiveID Corporation. VeriTeQ is majority owned and headed up, by Scott R. Silverman, former Chairman and CEO of PositiveID and VeriChip Corporation. PositiveID has retained an ownership interest in VeriTeQ.

On March 8, 2007, Tommy G. Thompson, an independent member of the Board of Directors of VeriChip, submitted a letter to the Company expressing his interest in taking a leave of absence from the Board of Directors in order to devote his full time and efforts to running for President as the Republican candidate of the United States.
In the Obama Health Care Bill, the need for a microchip implant first came up in H.R. 3200 section 2521, Pgs. 100-1007, paragraph 1. Tracing the need for a microchip implant in the various Health Care Bills can be confusing because of the changes and different bills involved. For example, with H.R.3590, America thought it was free of a ‘Healthcare System’ that would create a national medical registry and the population to be tagged with implantable RFID chips. But a second heath care related bill called “The Reconciliation Act of 2010” (2300 pages) was passed by the Senate on March 25th after being passed by the House on March 21st. In the text of the 2300 page bill, which our elected representatives, both Republicans and Democrats did not read, in section 2521, the creation of a National Medical Device Registry is enacted. This is portrayed as a registry to collect safety data on medical devices such as pacemakers and to put the safety data in a publicly accessible national electronic database. However, that is distinctly misleading.

In the section entitled: Subtitle C-11 Sec. 2521 – National Medical Device Registry, it states:
“The Secretary shall establish a national medical device registry (in this subsection referred to as the ‘registry’) to facilitate analysis of postmarket safety and outcomes data on each device that—‘‘(A) is or has been used in or on a patient; and ‘‘(B) is a class III device; or ‘‘(ii) a class II device that is implantable.”

The language conceals the fact, that it provides the structure for making America the first nation in the world that would require every U.S. citizen to receive an implanted radio-frequency (RFID) microchip for the purpose of controlling medical care. There are those that say the current legislation does not say this. But, the current legislation and laws surrounding the Health Care Bill are still in the process of being written. As such one cannot conclude that the microchip implant is simply going to disappear!
When Joe Biden, a Senator at the time asks Justice John Roberts at a Confirmation Hearing:
"Can a miniature tag be implanted into a human body to track his every movement? You will rule on that, mark my words, before your tenure is over."
The cat is out of the bag! Many of our elected officials know what the plan is.
You can dance around all the fine print in the legal language, but you cannot escape the fact that there is a plan to microchip the population. The truth is that if the global elites have their way, you are going to be implanted with a Radio Frequency Transponder (RFID Chip). Radio-frequency identification (RFID) employs the use of a wireless non-contact system, using radio-frequency electromagnetic fields to transmit data from a microchip, biochip or a microscopic technology called a nano-chip, for the purposes of automatic identification and tracking. The nano-chip is so small, you could be given one during a vaccination and never even know it! I am not advocating that all vaccinations are bad. But, you better know what they are injecting into your blood stream!

Nano-technology requires no battery and is powered by the electromagnetic fields used to read them. Some chips can use a local power source or even the electricity in your body and can broadcast radio waves (electromagnetic radiation) at radio frequencies.
The plan to microchip the U.S. population goes back a lot farther than Bush or Obama. In a testimony called “Microchip Implants and Cybernetics 12-6-1,” in 1974, a Congressional testimony from Dr. Jose Delgado stated, “We need a program of PSYCHOSURGERY for political control of our society.” Dr. Jose M. Delgado Professor of Neuropsychiatry, Yale University Medical Records, Number 26, Vol. 118 February 1974. Delgado said, “Man does not have the right to develop his own mind. We must electrically control the brain.”
Zbigniew Brzezinski who is a founder of the Trilateral Commission, and former National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter advocated a technological dictatorship. "In the technotronic society the trend would seem to be towards the aggregation of the individual support of millions of uncoordinated citizens, easily within the reach of magnetic and attractive personalities effectively exploiting the latest communications techniques to manipulate emotions and control reason." 

In 1970, in his book he wrote while a professor at Columbia University, entitled, “Between Two Ages: America's Role in the Technetronic Era,” Brzezinski made the following statement :
"Political strategists are tempted to exploit research on the brain and human behavior. Geophysicist Gordon J.F. MacDonald, a specialist in problems of warfare, says accurately-timed, artificially-excited electronic strokes could lead to a pattern of oscillations that produce relatively high power levels over certain regions of the earth ... in this way one could develop a system that would seriously impair the brain performance of very large populations in selected regions over an extended period."

" ... no matter how deeply disturbing the thought of using the environment to manipulate behavior for national advantages, to some, the technology permitting such use will very probably develop within the next few decades." This is already being used with EMF waves coming from satellites, remote transmitters, television, cell phones, computers and other sources.”

“The technotronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values (like liberty and democracy). Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal information about the citizen. These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities. This is happening now with technologies so advanced, that the average America does not know they exist. We are as the science fiction Robert Heinlein said, “A Stranger in a Strange Land.”

Aldous Huxley, H.G. Wells, Bertrand Russell and other Fabian socialists, wrote about his scientific dictatorship in the late 1800s, where society would be ruled by an elite, or a scientific dictatorship. Our world has become a planetary matrix where, with few exceptions, people are under the influence of highly sophisticated mind control, implemented by technologies that they don’t even know exist.

This gives a scientific elite total control over mass populations, creates a nation of robots and total electronic mind control. This is just the beginning of the brave new world of microchip technology. The science fiction writer, Philip K. Dick, wrote many movies that deal with these subjects including “Minority Report,” “Total Recall,” “Blade Runner, “Adjustment Bureau,” and “A Scanner Darkly.” The microchip is the world of science fiction and prophecy in which we now live.In Revelation 13:16-18, it talks about the False Prophet working with the Antichrist: “And he caused all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is six hundred threescore and six.” I explain this in my 3-DVD series, “Are You Ready for the Coming One World Government, One World Economic System and the Coming One World Religion?”  http://www.newswithviews.com/McGuire/paul136.htm


Dennis D. Dinktwigger: Banks

Here's a thought...  

A bank is a place that will lend you money if you can prove that you don't need it. 

And then....

 I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.

Sunday, July 29, 2012

Common Ownership: Obamanoidism

From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.

If you’ve got a business, you didn’t build that. Somebody else made that happen.
~ Karl Marx, “Critique of the Gotha Program” (1875)
~ President Barack Obama (2012)

When President Obama goes off prompter, he usually tells truth … at least the “truth” as he sees it. Obama’s quote above not only reminds me of Karl Marx, the father of socialism and communism, moreover, his arrogant, anti-business, anti-capitalism screed reminds me of the words of Thomas Jefferson who wisely said, “A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take away everything you have.” Perhaps that’s why so many Marxists and socialists professors and liberal teachers are rewriting and revising history today, because they don’t want the voting public to be knowledgeable about the truth of history, politics and economics. Why? Hitler’s minister of propaganda, Joseph Goebbels, said it best: “Truth is the enemy of the State.”
Here is Obama’s quote from that Marxist rant against American enterprise and free-market capitalism he delivered two weeks ago:
“If you were successful, somebody along the line gave you some help. There was a great teacher somewhere in your life. Somebody helped to create this unbelievable American system that we have that allowed you to thrive. Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you’ve got a business. you didn’t build that. Somebody else made that happen. The Internet didn’t get invented on its own. Government research created the Internet so that all the companies could make money off the Internet.”
In a Marxist worldview, government, or the State, is infinitely more important than people. Obama and the Democratic Socialist Party’s Marxist understanding will be made possible by the socialist promise of economic and societal utopia where there is an abundance of goods and services (“from each according to his abilities …”) that a developed socialist society will use to provide everyone’s needs (“… to each according to his needs”). The idea is that, with the full development of Western Marxism or scientific socialism and unrestrained productive forces, everyone’s needs will be satisfied in an egalitarian fashion.
That is a lie from the very pit of hell.
Although the Marx epigram is popularly attributed to the father of communism, he did not originate the phrase. The slogan was not only a common mantra of the socialist movement in the 19th century, it was first used in an 1839 book by Louis Blanc called “The Organization of Work.” Also, the phrase may have been inspired by the work of the French utopian Étienne-Gabriel Morelly, whose 1755 work, “Code of Nature,” mentions “Sacred and Fundamental Laws that would tear out the roots of vice and of all the evils of a society.” These include:
  1. Nothing in society will belong to anyone, either as a personal possession or as capital goods, except the things for which the person has immediate use, for either his needs, his pleasures, or his daily work.

  2. Every citizen will be a public man, sustained by, supported by and occupied at the public expense.

  3. Every citizen will make his particular contribution to the activities of the community according to his capacity, his talent and his age; it is on this basis that his duties will be determined, in conformity with the distributive laws.
40th Anniversary – Forward to the victory of Communism
Morelly’s principles were a direct assault on private property, individual liberty, free enterprise, Natural Law and God. Under the Morelly/Marx paradigm, God is dead – materialism and the State become god.
History has borne out Morelly and Marx’s diabolical ideas in American history. Pick any grand, utopian, liberal, humanist, progressive, or socialist policy over the past 112 years – Theodore Roosevelt’s “Square Deal,” Woodrow Wilson’s “Statolatry” (state worship), FDR’s “New Deal” and welfare-state policies of the 1930s and ’40s, Truman’s “Fair Deal,” LBJ’s “Great Society,” Nixon’s EPA, Carter’s Department of Education, Clinton’s failed attempt at universal health care, or President Obama’s neo-socialist, Keynesian policies contained in Obamacare today. In other words, these progressive presidents followed Mussolini’s famous fascist slogan of 1923 – Everything in the State, nothing outside the State, nothing against the State.
While Obama and the Democratic Socialist Party today may not be doctrinaire Marxists, they are indeed socialists and belong to a political strand of Marxist-Leninism euphemistically referred to as “Western Marxism” and “Cultural Communism.”
Unlike Bolsheviks – who systematically and systemically utilize terrorism and violent tactics to obtain absolute power, progressing from democracy or monarchy to then impose socialism as a stepping stone towards communism – Western Marxists like Obama exploit the trappings natural to democracy to contrive getting elected and then mercilessly exploit the reins of political power. Next, Western Marxists seek to immediately institute a torrent of radical reforms, regulations and legislation, thus propelling society inevitably into a welfare state, socialism and, if feasible, toward communism.
President Obama is a Western Marxist, a Western Leninist, that is, one of those who are known also generally as a Cultural Communists. According to Antonio Gramsci, a Marxist political theorists, once power is seized, the mask comes off and the ruler and his socialist minions revert back to their Bolshevik roots, as needed and, even, as convenient. Fomenting economic, political, religious, social and cultural chaos is key to maintaining his grip on power.
In conclusion, two major ways to turn back 112 years of Democratic and Republican socialism are:
1) No taxation without representation. Repeal all of the laws and amendments that violate this sacred principle of our Founding Fathers, especially the 16th Amendment (thus returning control of interest rates, printing money, debt and deficit control back into the hands of Congress) and the 17th Amendment (returning, then, to the original process of electing U.S. senators by state legislators, which promoted strong states’ rights). I’m hoping that Rep. Ron Paul’s Audit the Fed bill will start this process.
2) Follow the wise advice of my radio co-host Mr. Charles McCollough and “vote out of office every Democrat [Socialist] you can find!”

Off to see....

Dennis D. Dinktwigger: Cliche

Here's a thought...    There are few nudities so objectionable as the naked truth. 

And then....   Any great truth can -- and eventually will -- be expressed as a cliche -- a cliche is a sure and certain way to dilute an idea. For instance, my grandmother used to say, 'The black cat is always the last one off the fence.' I have no idea what she meant, but at one time, it was undoubtedly true. 

Saturday, July 28, 2012

Protecting the Environment or Redistribution Wealth?

Reality Vs Spin
Those who are determined to impose global governance on the rest of us have made great sport out of attacking anyone who dares oppose their plans. They have attacked those who challenge their claims of global warming by calling for “Nuremburg-style” show trials. Al Gore has actually called for violence against climate “skeptics.” The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) has called those who oppose the policies of Barack Obama domestic terrorists. But if you watch and listen long enough, you will hear incredible things come out of their mouths. You will find that they really are lying about their intent. It’s not really about saving the environment – but about controlling the world – just like we opponents said. Amazing, isn’t it? Here, let them tell you in their own words:

We said the issue over Climate Change wasn’t really about protecting the environment but about redistribution of wealth. They called us “deniers.” But who is really denying the truth?
“First of all, developed countries have basically expropriated the atmosphere of the world community. But one must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world’s wealth by climate policy. Obviously, the owners of coal and oil will not be enthusiastic about this. One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore, with problems such as deforestation or the ozone hole.” - Ottmar Edenhofer, German economist and official of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
But then there is the spin of “Climate Crisis.”

If current trends continue, if current patterns of production and consumption of natural resources prevail and cannot be reversed and ‘decoupled,’ then governments will preside over unprecedented levels of damage and degradation.” - UN Under-Secretary General and UNEP Executive Director Achim Steiner

So, which is it – disaster or redistribution of wealth? Well, both actually. The disaster they are talking about is not “environmental” but political. And only redistribution of wealth can prevent it. Observe the following quotes:

“Eradicating poverty is the greatest global challenge facing the world today and an indispensable requirement for sustainable development. In this regard we are committed to free humanity from poverty and hunger as a matter of urgency.” - Second paragraph of the draft copy of the official Rio+20 document “The Future We Want.”
And how will poverty be eradicated? Redistribution of wealth (your wealth), of course…
“We emphasize the need to enhance tax revenues through modernized tax systems, more efficient tax collection, broadening the tax base and effectively combating tax evasion. We stress that these efforts should be undertaken with an overarching view to make tax systems more pro-poor.”

“We recognize that for significant international financing to give strong support to the various commitments made in the outcomes of Rio+20, the developed countries agreed to provide new and additional resources exceeding UD 30 billion per year from 2013 – 17 to the developing countries in their efforts toward promotion of sustainable development.”

This all means redistribution of wealth, away from developed nations to the Third World. It would give the UN 0.7% of a nation’s gross national product = to $1,325 per year for an American family of four. The “spin” is environmental protection. The “reality” is UN control of our economy.
“We also pledge that for a more sustained and longer-term financial support we agree to enhance the mobilization to UN 100 billion per year from 2018 onwards and work towards setting up a financial mechanism, including a possible sustainable development fund.” - Pages 72 and 73 of the draft copy of the official Rio+20 document “The Future We Want.” http://www.newswithviews.com/DeWeese/tom219.htm

Everything but 1936...

Dennis D. Dinktwigger: Lang-u-age

Here's a thought...       Language exerts hidden power, like a moon on the tides.

And then....  The great thing about human language is that it prevents us from sticking to the matter at hand.